|
Indwelling
Subclavian Catheters and a Visit with the
"Pinched-off Sign"
Rene
Lafreniere, MD, CM, FRCSC, FACS
From the
Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology,
University of Calgary. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Sug
Oncol 1991;47(4):261-264.
Percutaneously inserted
indwelling subclavian vein silastic catheters have
revolutionized the administration of chemotherapeutic
agents. complications associated with insertion of such
lines have always included bleeding, pneumothorax,
haemothorax, arterial cannulation, and catheter
displacement. Recently a patient receiving 5-fluorouracil
and folinic acid for 11 months for small bowel carcinoma
experienced a catheter fracture with distal segment
embolization in the right atrium. A literature survey
revealed 13 cases where mechanical shearing forces on the
catheter caused by compression of the catheter between
the clavicle and first rib were thought to be the cause
for this complication. Interestingly all cases involved
patients receiving chemotherapy. Radiologically,
potential candidates for catheter fracture can be
identified by the pinch-off sign with bending and
pinching of the catheter at the thoracic inlet.
Recommendations are for more lateral insertions of such
percutaneouslhy placed catheters and if the pinched-off
sign is seen, then said catheters should be followed
radiologically and probably should not remain in situ for
longer than 6 months.
Key words: venous
access, chemotherapy, catheters
Introduction
Central
venous silastic catheters are now frequently used
whenever long-term venous access is deemed necessary for
total parenteral nutrition or chemotherapy. Use of the
percutaneous technique using a split-sheath introducer
has been advocated as a rapid and highly effective method
for inseertion of such lines 1,2,3. Whereas embolication of catheter tips
during placement of subclavian cathers in a
well-recognized risk 4, spontaneous fracture and embolization
of implanted silastic catheters has rarely been reported.
In this paper, I present a patient who had an indwelling
Port-A-Cath® system for 11 months and who
developed a catheter fracture at the junction of the
first rib and the clavicle along with distal catheter
embolization. In addition, a literature review along with
a review of mechanisms involved is presented.
Literature
Review
A review of all cases
of fractured indwelling subclavian catheters inserted
into the subclavian vein using the percutaneous approach
is presented in Table 1. Two cases were reported by
Aitken and Minton 5, 8 by Rubenstien et al. 6, 1 by Brincker and Saeter 7, 1 by Prager and Hertzberg 8, and 1 by Carr 9. If we include the case
presented in this paper, the total is now 14. It should be
noted that all 14 cases occurred in patients receiving
chemotherapy. Although some of the fractures occurred
within weeks of insertion (4 weeks), most occurred later
with the present case occurring at 11 month. The mean
time of insertion before fracture was 6.5 months with a
median of 6 months. Where documented, the catheter took
on the shape of a fish-mouth at the fracture site
documenting compression between the first rib and
clavicle. This was also associated with a kink of the
catheter that could be visualized on chest X-ray in cases
where such radiographs were available. There was no
difference in the incidence of catheter fractures
between the left and right subclavian veins (left: 5,
right: 4, not documented: 5). Catheter size was only
available in 4 cases but fractures occurred even when
small catheters were inserted (1.0 mm = 3 French).
Although most of the fractured catheters were of the
Hickman® type, this probably reflects
the standard of practice at the time of the published
reports. One Broviac ® catheter, one vascular access
port, one Infusa-Port ® , and one
Port-A-Cath® have also been reported. In all cases
reported, transvenous extraction of the embolized segment
was successfully carried out.
Discussion
Catheter embolization
for implanted venous access devices is an uncommon
event. If we include the case presented in this paper,
there are now 14 well-documented cases (Table 1). Even
with such a small number, the major risk factors are now
apparent. In previous reports by Atiken and Minton 5 and Prager and Hertzberg 8, microscopic and structural
analysis indicated that the fracture probably occurred at
the site of a pre-existing kink in the catheter. In our
own case, the kink could be seen on X-ray films prior to
catheter fracture (Fig. 1, insert). Atiken and Minton 5, Rubenstein et al. 6, and Prager and Hertzberg 8, postulated that movement of
the clavicle produced intermittent compression of the
catheter as it passed over the first rib resulting in
shearing forces that weakened the catheter and resulted
in subsequent separation. Despite this very plausible
postulate, it is most striking to me that all fractures
documented thus far have been in patients receiving
chemotherapy. Information regarding signs and symptoms
associated with catheter embolization is extrememly
limited. Patients reports by Prager and Hertzberg 8 and Carr 9 experienced chest discomfort
which was spontaneous. The patient reported herein had
pain on flushing of the Port-A-Cath®
along the tunneled catheter. Most patients, however, were
asymptomatic. In all cases documented in Table I except
for the case presented by Brincker and Saeter 7, the catheters were retrieved
percutaneously and this should be the preferred approach
in view of recent technological advances. 10, 11, 12
The percutaneous
subclavian method has gained wide acceptance because of
ease of insertion. Despite this new complication of
catheter fracture, this approach is still preferred as
the complication appears to occur in less than 1% of all
insertions 6. The following precautions may help
minimize the problem: 1) the subclavian puncture should
be made at the mid-clavicular location rather than more
medially; 2) fluoroscopic assessment at the time of
insertion and a chest X-ray in the upright position
should be done to look for catheter kinking; 3) in
kinking is identified then a chest X-ray at 2 monthly
intervals should be done to identify progressions of
kinking; 4) if any evidence of kinking is seen on
follow-up chest X-ray, the catheter should probably be
removed before 6 months has elapsed, as the mean time to
fracture in this reivew was 6.5 months, and then replaced
if necessary with another catheter.
Conclusions
Medial insertion of
silastic subclavian catheters using the percutaneous
technique can lead to compression and fracture of such
catheters. Chest X-rays to identify catheter compression
should be carried out; if such compression is seen, then
catheters should be changed before 6 months has elapsed
as they are liable to fracture and undergo distal venous
embolization. Embolized fragments should be removed
percutaneously.
Acknowledgments: The
author wishes to thank Ms. Rejeanne Barolet for her
excellent secretarial assistance. This research was made
possible through a grant from a Alberta Heritage
Foundation for Medical Research.
Reprinted by permission
of Wiley-Liss, a division of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
References
1.Aitken
Dr, Catalono R, Minton JP. Central venous access in
oncology patients: the "peel-away" sheath
for rapid insertion. J Surg Oncol 10=983;22:81-83.
2.Shulman
IA. Percutaneous insertion of a permanent
hyperlimentation catheter. Arch Surg
1982;117:976-977.
3.Kirkemo
A, Johnston MR. Percutaneous subclavian vein
placement of the Hickman catheter. Surgery
1982;91:349-351.
4.Feliciano
DV, Mattox KL, Graham JM. Major complications of
percutaneous subclavian catheters. Am J Surg
1979;138:869-874.
5.Aitken
DR, Minton JP. The "Pinch-off sign": a
warning of impending problems with permanent
subclavian catheters. Am J Surg 1984;148:633-636.
6.Rubenstein
RB, Alberty RE, Michels LG, Pederson RW, Rosenthal D.
Hickman catheter separation. J Parenter Enterol Nutr
1985;9:754-757.
7.Brincher
H, Saeter G. 55 patient yea experience with a toally
implanted system for intravenous chemotherapy. Cancer
1986;57:1124-1129.
8.Prager
D, Hertzberg RW. Spontaneous intravenous catheter
fracture and embolication from an implanted venous
access port and analysis by scanning electron
microscpoy. Cancer 1987;60:270-273.
9.Carr
ME. Catheter emboliczation from implanted vnous
access devices: Case reports. Angiology
1989;12:319-323.
10.Fisher
RG, Ferreyro R. Evaluation of current techniques for
nonsurgical removal of intravascular foreign bodies.
Am J Radio 1978; 130:541-548.
11.Edwards
AC, Sowton E.F. Management of embolized central
venous catheters. Br Med J Clin Res 1978;2:669-670.
12.Huang
TY, Abaskaron M. Non-surgical removal of intravasular
fragmented catheters. Am Fam Physician
1984;30:177-180.
|