Meditheses Home










Long Term Central Venous Catheters: Issues for Care

Rita Wickham, MS, RN; Sandra Purl, MS, RN; and Diane Welker MS, RN

From the College of Nursing and Section of Medical Oncology, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL; and Harley Medical Center, Flint, MI.

Seminars in Oncology Nursing l996;8,2(May):133-147.

Long-term central venous catheters (hereafter referred to as catheters) have become a fact of life for a significant number of persons with cancer and for their caregivers. The placement of a catheter in most instances allows the safe administration of chemotherapy, blood and blood products, total parenteral nutrition (TPN), fluids, and other medications. The use of central venous catheters has led to increased patient comfort as well as enhanced therapeutic options such as continuous intravenous (IV) infusions of vesicant agents and ambulatory continuous IV therapy. Despite their benefits, at least 10% of patients will experience problems secondary to catheter placement and/or use.1 Although the risk of certain complications, may be greater with one type of device over another, some risk exists for every person who has a catheter. Thus, the health care team must practice preventative measures, recognize early signs and symptoms of complications and provide adequate care should complications occur. This article will focus on the major catheter complications including fibrin sleeve and mural thrombus formation, infection, catheter occlusion, extravasation, and catheter malposition, and will examine current recommendations for their management, particularly as it relates to the nurse's role.

Top

Overview of Long-Term Central Venous Catheter

Three general types of long-term catheters are available: nontunneled, tunneled, and implanted ports. Table 1 depicts different types of catheters and specific features.2-5 All catheters have a radiopaque strip so they can be visualized on chest radiograph or fluoroscope after placement to document the position of the catheter tip. The optimal catheter tip location is in the superior vena cava (SVC) at or above the junction of the right atriums.6

Top

Extraluminal Catheter Occlusion

Extraluminal occlusion involves either fibrin sleeve or thrombus formation, which may present similar clinical findings but are entirely different processes.

Fibrin Sleeve

Fibrin sleeves, which do not adhere to the venous intima beyond their point of origin or to the catheter surface, develop in the majority of silicone catheters in as little as 48 hours or up to several months after placement.7 8 The sleeve originates at the point of venous entry and forms as a consequence of exposure of the catheter surface to blood. Platelets and fibrin are deposited along the catheter in a tubelike fashion and over time extend to the distal catheter tip and even beyond it. Once the sleeve extends beyond the catheter tip, withdrawal occlusion may occur, in which the catheter can be easily flushed but blood cannot be aspirated. Instructing the patient to change positions or to perform the Valsalva maneuver may allow blood to be withdrawn. Administering 5,000 to 10,000 units of urokinase through the catheter and allowing it to dwell within the device for more than 1 hour more reliably lyses the sleeve to restore blood sampling capability.9 l0 Lack of blood return in and of itself does not mean a catheter cannot be used for infusions unless withdrawal occlusion results from other complications (i.e., catheter occlusion or displacement).

Thrombus Formation

Catheter-induced thrombosis is most likely multifactorial. Catheterization itself causes endothelial injury of the vessel wall from the catheter tip, catheter, or introducer during cannulation.ll 12 This injury induces the release of thromboplastic substances and causes platelets to aggregate at the site of injury. The initial damage may progress to small thrombi that arise from and adhere firmly to the vessel wall (mural thrombi), and ultimately to large veno-occlusive thrombi, which may propagate retrograde and/or antegrade into the superior and/or inferior vena cava and/or right atrium.l3 Although stiff catheters (i.e., polyvinyl chloride) are most likely to damage the venous intima, polyurethane and silicone catheters are also implicated in thrombosis.l4 Larger bore catheters are associated with a greater risk for thrombosis as is catheterization from the left side.l6

The catheter within the vein alters laminar blood flow and maximizes contact of blood cells with the venous intima, inducing a cycle of the release of thromboplastic substances and platelet aggregation at the basement membrane of the damaged areas.l5 l7 l8 Normally, the body's fibrinolytic system becomes activated to lyse the clot, but this requires an intact intima. Other factors, such as sclerosing chemotherapy agents, venous compression by mediastinal tumor, or bacterial colonization may initiate or aggravate this process.l8-22

Hypercoagulability, associated with malignancies including mucin-secreting adenocarcinomas of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and ovary, promyelocytic leukemia, and myeloproliferative disorders could also exacerbate thrombosis.l7 23

Patients with adenocarcinomas experience a higher rate of catheter related thrombi than do those with squamous cell tumors.l9

Signs and symptoms of thrombosis. Rates of thrombosis of 3.7% to 10% have been documented.24 25 Signs and symptoms of thrombosis may be subtle and delayed until complete occlusion of the vein occurs.13 l6 24 Physical findings relate to impeded venous return and may include edema of the neck, chest, or affected extremity as well as prominent superficial collateral veins on the ipsilateral chest (Fig. 1).26 Mild to moderate neck pain that may radiate down the arm or to the back, numbness and tingling of the ipsilateral extremity, skin temperature changes, or skin discoloration are later symptoms. Diagnosis is usually made when the patient has symptoms of complete occlusion, that is facial swelling, neck vein distention, and infusional difficulties.27 Nurses should document and communicate progressive symptoms, as lytic therapy is more likely to be successful if initiated early before calcification of the clot occurs.15

Thrombus location is usually confirmed by venogram through the catheter as well as through an ipsilateral peripheral vein.23 28 Duplex venous scans, doppler ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT) have been used to visualize thrombi.29 30

Management of extraluminal thrombus. Management depends on the severity of the symptoms, the need for the catheter, and other associated complications (i.e., infected thrombus). Studies have confirmed that low-dose warfarin (1 mg/day) can significantly reduce the rate of thrombus development without causing bleeding states.3l 32 However, therapy is more commonly initiated when symptoms of occlusive thrombus occur.

Symptomatic catheter-related thrombi are treated with anticoagulants, thrombolytic agents, and rarely surgical removal of the thrombus.30 Although some clinicians recommend removing the catheter before anticoagulant therapy, this decision depends on the severity of symptoms, the availability of peripheral access, risk for pulmonary emboli, and previous history of thrombosis.33

Heparin prevents further propagation of the thrombus and allows the formation of venous collaterals.15 Continuous IV thrombolytic therapy, either streptokinase or urokinase, has successfully lysed extraluminal thrombi in some cases.34 35 There are no standard doses or methods of administering fibrinolytic therapy. Fraschini et al35 recommend treating catheter tip thrombi directly with an infusion through the device and mural thrombi by peripheral infusion, using a vein as close to the thrombus as possible.

Streptokinase and urokinase activate the fibrinolytic system, so they can potentially induce hemorrhage.25 Nursing management thus includes identification of high-risk patients who would probably not receive this therapy, including those who have active internal bleeding, a recent history of cerebral vascular accident, intracranial or intraspinal surgery, or blood dyscrasias.36 Urokinase is derived from human kidney cells and streptokinase from bacteria. Streptokinase is much less expensive than urokinase but is more antigenic, and in rare instances causes fever, urticaria, nausea and vomiting, headache, and flushing.37 38 Patients receiving streptokinase are pretreated with acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, and hydrocortisone to minimize side effects. The only laboratory value that relates to bleeding complications in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy is serum fibrinogen, which is maintained at 80 to 100 mg/dL by titration of the fibrinolytic agent.35

Fig 1. Physical findings of venous thrombosis include enhanced superficial collateral veins on the ipsilateral chest wall.

Table 1. Overview of Catheter Features


Catheter Type Catheter Materials Number of Lumens Lumen Sizes Comments/ Distinguishing Features

Nontunneled catheter

Centrasil (Baxter, Deerfield, IL)
C-PICS (Cook, Bloomington, IN)
Per-Q-Cath (Gesco, San Antonio, TX )

Silicone
Silicone elastomer
Polyurethane
Single
Double
Triple
23 gauge to 16 gauge (ID) Available as centrally inserted subclavian lines and peripherally inserted PICC models (exit at antecubital space). These catheters are generally inserted into a vein <1 inch from exit site.

Tunneled catheter

Hickman Broviac (Davol/Bard, Salt Lake City, UT)
Reaf (Quinton, Seattle, WA)
Groshong (Davol/Bard)

Silicone Single
Double
Triple
1.0-3.2 mm (OD)
0.6-1.5 mm (ID)
Tunneled for several inches beneath skim from exit site to vein. Usually exit between nipple and sternum (catheters inserted into the IVC exit in the lower abdomen or groin). All have a dacron cuff 1 to 2 inches proximal to exit site to secure catheter and minimize risk of infection.

Implanted Port

Port-A-Cath (Pharmacia Deltec, St. Paul, MN)
Infuse-A-Port (Strato, Beverly, MA)
S.E.A. Port (Harbor Medical, Jaffrey, NH)
OmegaPort (Norfolk Medical, Skokie, IL)
P.A.S. Port (Pharmacia Deltec)

Silicone
Polyurethane
Single
Double
1.5-4.6 mm (OD)
1.0-1.6 mm (ID)
Silicone septum enclosed in plastic, stainless steel, or titanium port. Available for top, side or all direction access. Central and peripheral models available. Accessed with deflected tip (Huber) needles to prevent coring with subsequent leaking.

Abbreviations: OD, outer diameter; ID, inner diameter; IVC, inferior vena cava; PICC percutaneously inserted central catheter.

Top

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the generous educational grant from Pharmacia Deltec that made the printing of the color prints possible.

[NOTE: The balance of this article will be reprinted in a future issue of Meditheses.]

Reprinted by permission of Seminars in Oncology Nursing.

References

  1. Collins JL: Central venous catheter complications. Oncol Nurs Forum 18:819-820, 1991 (letter)
  2. Camp-Sorrell D: Advanced central venous access. Selection, catheters, devices, and nursing management. J Intravenous Nurs 13:361-370, 1990
  3. Winters V, Peters B, Coila S, et al: A trial with a new peripherally implanted vascular access device. Oncol Nurs Forum 17:891-896, 1990
  4. Masoorli S. Angeles T: PICC lines: The latest home care challenge. RN 53(1):44-50, 1990
  5. Goodman MS, Wickham R: Venous access devices: An overview. Oncol Nurs Forum 11(5):16-23, 1984
  6. Reed WP, Newman KA, de Jongh C: Prolonged venous access for chemotherapy by means of the Hickman catheter. Cancer 52:185-192, 1983
  7. Brismar B. Hardstedt C, Jacobson S: Diagnosis of thrombosis by catheter phlebography after prolonged central venous catheterization. Ann Surg 194:779-783, 1981
  8. Williams EC: Catheter-related thrombosis: Clin Cardiol 13:V134-V136, 1990
  9. Petersen FB, Clift RA, Hickman RO, et al: Hickman catheter complications in marrow transplant recipients. JPEN 10:58-62, 1986
  10. Schneider TC, Krzywda E, Andris D, et al: The malfunctioning silastic catheter-radiologic assessment and treatment. JPEN 10:70-73, 1986
  11. Ahmed N. Payne RF: Thrombosis after central venous cannulation. Med J Aust 1:217-220, 1976
  12. Cervera M, Dolz M, Herraez JV, et al: Evaluation of the elastic behaviour of central venous PVC, polyurethane and silicone catheters. Phys Med Biol 34:177-183, 1989
  13. Reed WP, Newman KA, Tenney JH, et al: Autopsy findings after prolonged catheterization of the right atrium for chemotherapy in acute leukemia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 160:417-420,1985
  14. Hadaway LC: Evaluation and use of advanced IV technology. Part 1: Central venous access devices. J Intravenous Nurs 12:73-83, 1989
  15. Horattas MC, Wright DJ, Fenton AH, et al: Changing concepts of deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremity-report of a series and review of the literature. Surgery 104:561-567, 1988
  16. Brown-Smith JK, Stoner MH, Barley ZA: Tunneled catheter thrombosis: Factors related to incidence. Oncol Nurs Forum 17:543-549,1990
  17. Luzzatto G, Schafer Al: The prethrombotic state in cancer. Semin Oncol 17:147-159, 1990
  18. Donayre CE, White GH, Mehringer SM, et al: Pathogenesis determines late morbidity of axillosubclavian vein thrombosis. Am J Surg 152:179-184,1986
  19. Anderson AJ, Krasnow SH, Boyer MW, et al: Thrombosis: The major Hickman catheter complication in patients with solid tumor. Chest 95:71-75, 1989
  20. Pithie A, Soutar JS, Pennington CR: Catheter tip position in central vein thrombosis. JPEN 12:613-614, 1988 (brief communication)
  21. Slagle DC, Gates RH: Unusual case of central vein thrombosis and sepsis. Am J Med 81:351-354, 1986
  22. Levine MN, Gent M, Hirsh J. et al: The thrombogenic effect of anticancer drug therapy in women with stage II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 318:404-407, 1988
  23. Lokich JJ, Becker B: Subclavian vein thrombosis in patients treated with infusion chemotherapy for advanced malignancy. Cancer 52:1586-1589,1983
  24. Moss JF, Wagman LD, Riihimaki DU, et al: Central venous thrombosis related to the silastic Hickman-Broviac catheter in an oncologic population. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 13:397-400, 1989
  25. Gray WJ, Bell WR: Fibrinolytic agents in the treatment of thrombotic disorders. Semin Oncol 17:228-237, 1990
  26. Lokich JJ, Bothe A, Benotti P. et al: Complications and management of implanted venous access catheters. J. Clin Oncol 3:710-717, 1985
  27. Beers TR, Burnes J, Fleming CR: Superior vena caval obstruction in patients with gut failure receiving home parenteral nutrition. JPEN 14:474-479, 1990
  28. Haire WD, Lieberman RP, Edney J, et al: Hickman catheter-induced thoracic vein thrombosis. Cancer 66:900-908, 1990
  29. Kaufman J, Demas C, Stark K, et al: Catheter-related septic central venous thrombosis-current therapeutic options. West J Med 145:200-203, 1986
  30. Levine M, Hirsh J: The diagnosis and treatment of thrombosis in the cancer patient. Semin Oncol 17:160-171, 1990
  31. Bern MM, Bothe A, Bistrian B. et al: Prophylaxis against central venous thrombosis with low-dose warfarin. Surgery 99:216-221, 1986
  32. Bern MM, Lokich JJ, Wallach SR, et al: Very low doses of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters. Ann Intern Med 112:423-428, 1990
  33. Hill SL, Berry RE: Subclavian vein thrombosis: A continuing challenge. Surgery 108:1-9, 1990
  34. Smith NL, Ravo B, Soroff HS, et al: Successful fibrinolytic therapy for superior vena cava thrombosis secondary to long-term total parenteral nutrition. JPEN 9:55-57, 1985
  35. Fraschini G, Jadeja J, Lawson M, et al: Local infusion of urokinase for the lysis of thrombosis associated with permanent central venous catheters in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 5:672-678, 1987
  36. Donovan BC: How to give thrombolytic therapy safely. Chest 95:290S-292S, 1989
  37. Marder VJ: The use of thrombolytic agents: Choice of patient, drug administration, laboratory monitoring. Ann Intern Med 90:802-808, 1979
  38. Kessler CM: Anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapy. Practical consideration. Chest 95:245S-255S, 1989